SsangYong is the 4th largest South Korean automaker and is known around the world for it’s awd SUV’s. Now owned by India’s Mahindra, they are slated to enter the US market by 2019.
One of SsangYong’s latest offerings is the mini Suv Tivoli, which can be had as awd or ft wheel drive, and a 1.6 liter gas or diesel engine, and a standard shift or Aisin automatic. From what I’ve seen in Ireland, they are almost all standard shifts, but the US is bound to be automatics mainly. It would be interesting to see how they do in the US, as their sister corporations Hyundai and Kia are selling like hotcakes.
My old MGB had synchromesh on the upper 3 gears but none on first. It did have one healthy second gear though, and for most purposes that stood in for first unless you were at a dead stop. Now it seems there was serious reluctance at British Motor Corporation to synchronize first gear at the very top of the company.
In a 1962 interview with Motor Magazine about the new Mini Minor, Sir Alec Issigonis said, “I don’t like synchromesh on bottom gear. I find that it is difficult to get into gear with it.” Which not only included cars that his company designed, but others in Europe at the time, “I have driven most of the small continental cars which have synchromesh on bottom gear, and found engaging bottom when the car was stationary was almost impossible.”
Well, that may be, but modern cars seem to have synchromesh down, including reverse. But synchromesh transmissions were only ten years old when Sir Alec made that statement, being introduced on Porsches in 1952. And even then, Sir Alec had to bow to consumer demand with all BMC cars going all-synchro for the forward gears in 1968.
I have driven a 1968 MGB and thought the shifter too far back, but I might already have been emotionally invested in the ’67 car. There were other things that put me off, padded dash and smog controls and such. But in the end I do have to admit synchro trannys are much more desirable than crash boxes.