2011 9-4X.. rarest production Saab?

The 9-4X project was blasted into oblivion when Saab suffered it’s GM induced bankruptcy.  It was made for one model year only, 2011, and only 457 of them were produced.  It was the only Mexican made Saab, built in the GM industrial complex at Ramos Arizpe, Mexico.  GM focused on this model as a replacement for the 9-7X, a Saabified version of the GM Trail Blazer SUV.  The new SUV was going to be based on the Subaru Tribeca, but GM sold it’s interest in Subaru, and the 9-4X design was chosen to be built.

picture of 9-4XThe design lives on in Caddy’s SRX, which is essentially the same car.  Power in the Saab version comes from 2 V-6s, a naturally aspirated 3.0 liter producing 265 hp, and the hot turbocharged Aero version pumping 300 horsepower.  The Aero is really rare, most cars were built with the slower engine. The Haldex AWD  system is used in all cars, and they are a comfortable and competent ride. As far as who contributed most to the car is unknown, Saab and GM’s engineers are all mixed up and who did what is impossible to determine.

picture of 9-4XThe problems with the car are few.  When prepping new models, it was found that they sat too long in the Mexican sun, and the blue plastic that covered the interior brightwork had all melted in place.  The 9-4X also suffers from a sunroof drain tube that shrinks, filling the passenger footwell and the glove box with water.  It’s also pretty cool that the replacement is too short also.  They also have a receiver/dryer for the air conditioning system that plugs up.

picture of 9-4X interiorAll in all, it’s a well engineered car that is luxurious to boot.  And you won’t run into another one on the road very often….

Ford’s modular V-8

Engines are incredibly complicated things, and it’s amazing they have all this technology stuffed in a compact (for the most part) package that actually fits in engine bays. (Although they do steal space from under the windshield.)  What’s even more amazing is the fact that you can take most of it apart while it is still in the car.  Granted, it can still be an incredible pain in the arse, and you will invoke dark forces upon the engineers who thought it all up, the fact that it can be done at all does hint at some incredible engineering feats.

picture of modular V-8
Land Rover 4.4 liter V-8

Take the Land Rover LR3, for instance. They shoehorned in one of Ford’s huge modular V-8’s in a space comfortable for the old aluminum Buick V-8 the Brit’s used to use.  The Ford engines appeared after Ford acquired the Rover Group from BMW.  This engine got around, being adaptable to supercharging, and came in sizes ranging from 3.2 to 5 liters.  They ended up in all kinds of Ford’s Euro cars, like Jaguar, Volvo and Aston Martin.


The engine in this Land Rover makes 300 hp and pulls this iconic Brit 4-wheeler around with little fuss, however, I’ve looked under a lot of Land Rovers and have yet to see mud under one of them.  Maybe I’m hanging around the wrong neighborhoods.

picture of failedTimingGear
This engine has a failed variable valve timing gear

The downside of all this engine technology is the cost.  Having all these cams and variable valve timing, direct injection and drive by wire stuff costs a pretty good pile, especially if it breaks.  It seems to me that crashing cars used to be the main reason they were scrapped, but more and more, it’s the cost of repair. If you have to change a burnt piston, or replace timing chains on one of these motors, and the car is pushing 150k, it’s almost not worth doing.  And it’s a shame, as these engines are really marvels of engineering…. but expensive marvels.